Originally Posted by Thedude86

lol. That sounds like something my ex-wife would say. You really know how to twist words don’t you?

I don’t think United should mandate anything. I’m not advocating forcing people to use Ivermectin. I’m also not advocating against vaccines. It should be your choice to use Ivermectin or to get a vaccine with twice yearly boosters for the rest of your life or to not do anything at all. But if legally, United can mandate a vaccine, then so be it.

With that said though, if United can mandate a vaccine with boosters for eternity, then what’s to say they can’t mandate a drug you don’t agree with? Like maybe, Ivermectin? What if 5 years down the road after all the drug companies made their billions and covid has tapered off… Dr. Fauci and the FDA then come out and say, “we know it’s been over 40 years but we finally decided to do real world studies and we conclude that Ivermectin is safe and extremely effective.” Would you then be ok with United mandating the use of Ivermectin in anyone showing symptoms or having come into close contact with someone potentially infected with Covid? The bar has been set. You agree with it now, you might not agree with it next time.