Originally Posted by
Aquaticus
I don't know where you are getting your numbers or "real data" from but the CDC, FDA, etc aren't recommending Ivermectin for Covid. It is an anti-parasitic and covid is a virus. Every study or source you have presented has been questionable if not outright biased propaganda. The CDC is the one you need to convince not a bunch of pilots. They are the experts and do you really, truly believe your "india data" will hold up to any scrutiny? Your data is majority backed up by people with Hotmail email addresses instead of teaching hospitals, medical research labs, or basically any legitimate medical employers... doesn't that make you wonder?
The CDC already has a multiple safe, effective vaccines that reduce the spread. Masks work. Finding 1 out of 10 or 20 studies that aligns with your political conspiracy theory doesn't throw out the other 9 or 19 studies.
1. Please show how ANY of my studies are propaganda. Are you saying the thousands of doctors in the U.S. that have had success with Ivermectin are pushing propaganda? Is the entire country of India pushing propaganda? Is the Nobel assembly pushing propaganda? Is the entire continent of Africa pushing propaganda? Also, please show just 1 study from the CDC or FDA with actual data that says Ivermectin is harmful. They’ve put out several studies that claim it’s “uncertain” or “unclear” but none of these studies show both data collected from the ivermectin tested groups and the comparator placebo groups at the same time. Every study either says “high likelihood of bias” or they don’t provide any data at all from their own placebo groups to compare it to. So yea, your CDC data is real scientific. I’m not saying it is, but there is more evidence of the CDC pushing propaganda than anything I’ve posted. (Using your standards). The only one saying what I’ve posted is biased is you. Any study the CDC, FDA, or NIH puts out actually admits there is bias in their own report.
2. Are you saying numerous studies, at least one peer reviewed study, and a country with over a BILLION people using Ivermectin nationwide isn’t good enough for you?
https://www.cureus.com/articles/6480...thcare-workers
this is peer reviewed. It’s not from a hotmail address. It shows Ivermectin is far more successful than any vaccine without boosters. And even the booster effectiveness is still up for debate. This is far more data that shows Ivermectin works than anything the CDC or FDA has ever put out. Again, any data they show is only data from one group at a time. They never show their own studies in entirety, only partially.
You’re basically saying you don’t care about actual science and would rather listen to opinion based studies instead of any studies with any actual data. There are numerous other studies. Are the thousands of doctors that have used Ivermectin in the last year in the U.S. not good enough for you? Are they a bunch of crazies? Even though you can’t find ONE doctor that’s used it that would advise against it? Is India with a population of over a billion people using Ivermectin nationwide not good enough for you? They’ve almost wiped out Covid. Would a trillion people using Ivermectin be good enough? Sounds like those billions of Indians are just a bunch of conspiracy theorists who happened to get lucky. Please, go be a hero and tell them your opinions from the CDC and FDA are more reliable than their actual real world data.
Fun fact… the FDA’s own list of side effects for covid vaccines are significantly worse than the FDA’s own list of side effects for Ivermectin (which are the same as Tylenol). The FDA lists death as a side effect for the vaccines, not ivermectin. Ivermectin is sooooo dangerous that anyone who has ever used it has been completely fine. Oh wait, you’ll probably find someone who cooked it up with their meth and died and then say, “see it’s dangerous.”
You’re putting more faith in opinion and hope rather than actual fact, data, and science.
If you honestly don’t know the difference between Ivermectin in animals (injected liquid) and the human form (pill) you are just plain ignorant at this point. There is a major difference as even referenced by the FDA.