I can’t tell if you’re that oblivious or just ignorant. There is an animal version and a human version. Ask any doctor or the FDA. They will tell you. The fact that you don’t know that shows how ignorant you are on subject. NONE of the people going to the hospital for Ivermectin are going there for the human version. Over 2.8 BILLION people have used the human version since 1987. Researches won a Nobel prize for Ivermectin in humans in 2015. In 2019 the WHO listed Ivermectin as an essential medicine. Are you saying the WHO considers horse medication an essential medicine? Are you more educated on Ivermectin than the WHO? The FDA’s own website lists Ivermectin’s side effects no worse than Tylenol. Seizures are not one of them. The people you are referring to are going to the hospital for using their own random version of the animal version without ANY input from a doctor. Educate yourself. Please. There is a difference. As referenced by the FDA, CDC, NIH, and the WHO.

The link to your studies doesn’t work. But I have a feeling it’s like all the other studies. The conclusion will say “uncertain”. But in the report it’ll list how many people they tested. How many were tested for Ivermectin and how many for placebo. Then, it’ll give you the results for Ivermectin but then say nothing about how it compares to the results for placebo and then conclude it’s “uncertain”. If it does give any results… it will also say “high likelihood of bias”. I’ve asked in my previous comments to find data that shows 100% of the data collected. Not 25% of it.

You want to believe studies that are unwilling to report their data. But you ignore literally EVERY single study that reports it’s data, which btw, all support the use of Ivermectin. And these include a peer reviewed study, numerous other studies, EVERY doctor that has used it worldwide including thousands in the U.S., also India a country with over a billion people, and most recently a new Israeli study. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1....31.21258081v1
This shows people who used Ivermectin after infection were on average 2.6 times more likely to test negative after 6 days than the placebo group.

this website is also the same source that people used to claim unvaccinated were 19x more likely to be hospitalized than vaccinated. Yet, they’re own statistical data I posted previously shows that is far from the truth.

This link also says it is not peer reviewed, but if you go to the homepage you’ll see it’s funded by Mark Zuckerburg. I’d find it hard to believe that the king of fact checks himself would have to fact check his own data as false or misleading.

Please educate yourself on the differences in Ivermectin. And please, if you post a contradicting study, please post one that shows 100% of the data they collected.