Originally Posted by
Thedude86
The article can’t be 100% correct. Even if you take the effectiveness argument out of the equation… it has 2 different charts that completely contradict each other in reference to total numbers in the over 50 age group. And that was the only category I looked at. I didn’t even bother to look at the rest once I noticed that.
It's completely accurate, it's just that for most people, understanding statistics isn't intuitive and is why shock value of cherry picked percentages misinform most.
I'm not sure what charts you are referencing, but you may not have read that the about 1/2 way through he updates his charts with data from Sep 2nd.