Originally Posted by
iceman21
Sure do, but no one wants to read any of the actual science, medicine, or data posted by anyone on here anyway so, what's the difference?
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
The difference is that experts, physicians, and scientists have reviewed and continue to review the evidence. They have by an overwhelming majority reached a consensus. To most reasonable people that consensus carries more weight than two anecdotal events or the opinion of someone who earned a “B-“ in High School biology.
Several on here fail to realize that there is a difference between “research” done by those with relevant training and what (insert APC handle name here) does on the internet: confirmation bias Google searching. If you find yourself typing phrases such as “Why the C19 vaccine is bad”, there’s your sign you’re in the latter and a victim of the Dunning-Kruger effect.
You’re the equivalent of the guy in Orlando trying to get to Newark not understanding why there is a weather delay because “his wife is in Newark and she says the weather is beautiful.”