Originally Posted by
rickair7777
For our purposes, yes it is.
1. The "FDA" did no such thing, they haven't even made a determination yet but when they eventually do it will in fact have regulatory force (unlike the advisory panel's suggestions).
2. Recommending boosters for some demographics but not others is not "shooting down boosters".
Discussion over.
I guess it pays to be a mod?
I was typing on my phone. Your editor is aweful on that respect. Probably my silly android too
Anyway 2 votes happened that day.
We were provided transcripts of the 8 hours and 5 minutes of testimony later that day at my Congressman's office.
It went down pretty much like I said. If you have transcripts then maybe you can tell me where I missed that....I'm not seeing it.
When I posted, they had not had the vote for 65+ and at risk. that happened about 2 hours after my 16-2 vote post against ages 16-65.
Of course it's the FDA ADVISORY panel. The FDA administration has been following their guidelines so far. We don't see that changing, but it could.
Here's a pony so you don't get too ****ed at me🦄🦄🦄