Originally Posted by
PurpleToolBox
I don’t see why they would buy A350s unless they’re trying to get more ramp space at CDG. If they buy 777F, 777XFs or used 777-300ERFs you get essentially the same cargo capability with flight/maintenance training and parts commonality synergies with our existing system.
IMO I think we could use a bigger freighter at FDX … 747-8Fs before A350s. We have several routes where multiple 777s and MD-11s fly to every day. I wonder if freight consolidation and flying less flights with a 747-8F would work financially?
Also, this would free up ramp space and make spots available for new markets. Memphis is maxed out for any new available parking spot unless the modernization of the hub creates more spots or they decide to buy more land.
FS has said in the past that he would never buy a freighter again with more than 2 engines. I also don’t see why we would go the A350 route and agree with your premises listed above. IMHO, the same arguments apply to a 747 variant.
I have heard that, yes, ramp space is a problem (more of a challenge) but it’s not a limfac in aircraft purchasing.
The substantiated rumor that’s been often repeated is more city pairs. LAX-CDG, MIA-CDG, OAK-SYD (already been flown by standards), etc… So, IMHO, Fred will buy more 777F’s off the Everett line rather than a new airplane.
IIRC, aircraft purchases have been stand-alone-type PA events too and not necessarily announced during an EC.
I’ll read the transcript of the EC later, we shall see!