Originally Posted by
MiLtoMajor123
Wikipedia a reliable source? Yeah no! It's more like cliff notes which have been altered for public consumption and sometimes very politically biased.
Please share one of your "approved" sources for unbiased news.
Originally Posted by
MiLtoMajor123
As far as mandate precedent. Do they consider lethality of the disease and effectiveness of the vaccine?
Polio doesn't kill. Still mandated.
Originally Posted by
MiLtoMajor123
What was the standard for FDA approval of a vaccine prior to covid?
It remains unchanged.
Originally Posted by
MiLtoMajor123
One would also have to consider herd immunity and natural immunity right? No point in mandating a vaccine you don't need if you've already been infected and recovered?
There's no way to verifiably confirm that a person has had a previous infection and acquired immunity. The antibody testing is notoriously unreliable, not standardized, and prohibitively expensive. A $10 dollar vaccine is the cheapest and simplest way to confirm immunity.
Originally Posted by
MiLtoMajor123
So another question is....what are we being vaccinated against? Are the FDA approved vaccines effective (over time) against the Delta variant? And if not....why would a mandate of an older vaccine vice the booster ...be mandated if it's old news?
Boosters over time bring efficacy back over 95%. At some point, all your complaints just devolve into whining.