Originally Posted by machz990

So getting the “vaccine” provides immunity against infection and transmission?

Yellow Fever vaccine has been an approved and proven vaccine for decades. Can you say the same about mRNA vaccines? Yellow Fever vaccine uses an inert form of the virus to stimulate the immune system to produce not only antibodies but long lasting B and T-cells. Not the same process with these new mRNA vaccines which cause your body to produce a specific spike protein.

When you get a vaccine that falls under an EUA you have to sign a document of informed consent stating you understand there may be unknown risks but you believe the benefits outweigh the risks. If your employer forces you to get this vaccine under a mandate you still have give informed consent regardless of your beliefs. Informed consent relieves everyone of any legal liability for any adverse reaction up to and including death. This is the equivalent of having someone force you to sign a confession with a gun to your head. It is coercion. Until these vaccines are all FDA approved the comparison made that it’s the same as any other required vaccine is a false argument. To head off those who will jump and say Pfizer’s vaccine is FDA approved, until it says “Comirnaty” on the bottle it isn’t the FDA approved vaccine. Read the FDA’s ruling. The FDA also required in the ruling, as a condition of approval, that Myocarditis be added as a warning to the label and product insert.

https://youtu.be/noA9PMJZzAQ