View Single Post
Old 03-03-2008 | 05:05 AM
  #46  
FR8Hauler's Avatar
FR8Hauler
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Cliffy170
I guess the operative word in both of your posts is "Flies". But, if that is true, why all of the preemptive strikes? I know a lot of pilots will fly the trips they have: traded for, picked-up in open time, requested for VTO, or volunteered for. True, some will try to drop them now that some observant and motivated individuals have brought it to their attention (and to the attention of their APC peers) but, most will not, citing various excuses.

RV has a good point but what's past is prologue. There were opportunities to stand up for quality of life issues that were neglected during negotiations. Mostly, the MEM crews that flew published DP's without fear of retribution, or admonition were the root cause, and still are. Do you think we should stop harassing (have we even started?) our fellow pilots or, should we turn up the heat?

Slings and arrows. Metaphorically mentioned already:
1. Public pillory (I guess this counts as a public forum)
2. Education
3. Cold cockpits (attitude not temperature)
4. E-mails

Tongue-in-cheek, our frail pilot egos are affected when our peers see us as anything but a team player. Although some seem to delight in it. Why?


Cliffy <------ stepping down from soap box.
Cliffy, I don't think harrassing is appropriate. However, all of us need to let them know of our displeasure for what they are doing. Like I mentioned before there are a lot of emotional issues out there that are making people do things they normally would not do when it comes to ALPA right now. A lot of folks are really pi$$ed about the age 60 issue and other topics which we all know FedEx ALPA leadership went completely off and just did what national dictated to them. I am not making excuses for anybody. I still think it is reprehensible to go against all of us fellow pilots and fly these things.
Reply