Originally Posted by
Drum
No, it didn't
That's what Rachel is telling you.
Tell us then, about what just happened at Amtrak?
The NY ruling was narrow. The exemptions where written about 7 months ago - poorly.
The fact that the SCOTUS invoked the Pope is humorous in their ruling. Pope is not God. Any good exemption letter for those of the Catholic faith would point that out.
Have you read the exemption letters proffered? No. You didn't. It was no surprise to ANYONE that the SCOTUS would rule this way on this very much narrow case.
If what you say is true (and its not BTW) then ALL religious exemptions are moot. That is purely not the case. Exemptions are being approved daily across this country after that ruling. Again, this case has NO BEARING save for the narrow scope of the lawsuit filed against the State of New York Healthcare.
Go back to your Xbox and MSNBC and keep your eye out for when Roe gets nuked.
Not to go all Joe McCarthy, but 6 of the justices are professed Catholics.
Interesting that they'd cite their own personal religious leader in a secular case and institution, particularly in a country that is nominally majority Protestant.
(I'm probably going to get sent to the penalty box for that one. Oops. Facts. ).