Originally Posted by
Drum
what are you talking about?
Explain yourself. Is your reading comprehension that juvenile?
The ruling is not established precedent as you claim (I saw the same statement in the crawl on MSNBC BTW, so your comment is stolen and not original - at least give them citation credit)
Religious exemptions are being approved, right now, across this country, after the ruling. If the case you claim in NY is indeed precedent, they would be moot.
Again, you're pitching way out of your league here.
As usual, you have a very tainted view. What I'm saying is, if another case comes across their docket, they'd be bound by this ruling, not by law, but by precedent. So, Florida says the Hospitals can't mandate the vax by the same way NY did, what will they say? Now, some entity would need to sue. I said nothing about religious exemptions. The supreme court ruled long ago that sincerely held religious beliefs were a valid exemption. Precedent.