Originally Posted by PilotWombat

Don't get snarky and shirk your responsibility. You're the one that made the expansive claim; you alone have the burden of substantiating it.

For the record, of the 10 studies shown on the first page of the link you posted in your defense:

• Three specifically cite the limitations of VAERS and describe it as a poor singular data source useful only for pattern monitoring for further research.
• Five do exactly that (pattern monitoring) and each follows up with a statement that VAERS is at best unreliable and in three cases, directly calls out that the reported cases have no connection to vaccination.
• One uses it as a source for a lit review, but specifically states it provides correlation data, not causation.
• One has no mention of VAERS in it at all.

Try again.