View Single Post
Old 01-10-2022 | 04:30 PM
  #19  
Torque
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by EWRflyr
Hearing the C12 meeting currently going on is in chaos.

RAP pilots controlling agenda.

Pilots learning the C12 chair person advocated strongly against the PPU MOU but abstained from voting and picked up a DEL premium trip on 30th for 31st knowing the MOU would pass and she would get 250% add pay….all before this was made public to the pilot group? Insider information and epitome of corruption?
Were you there? Abstention to voting on an already passed MOU? What's the use? What where the arguments against it? Was it the confusion over any trip picked up or the clarification that had to be made later? Was it that the perception that the MEC ****ed away some negotiating power? Was it that the MOU effectively ends senior manning?

The pilots of C12 learned that an MOU that alters the contract was passed when the MEC had 51% and not all LECs voted yet. It was done very fast. I'll be looking for the voting record.

Originally Posted by BoJet
actually, even worse:
WM picked up a trip during MEC deliberation on the MOU knowing it would pass. Insider information allowed her to abrogate seniority! She picked up a trip before it went to full JMM pay knowing that she’d received 350% pay for the trip.
strong representation 🙄
recall?
Lies, from what I'd reading above. Who do you represent?

Originally Posted by fadec
This is the 3rd side letter to essentially backdate decisions regarding pay. Maybe that isn't working out so well.

Also, I think her abstention is actually more corrupt than voting since she argued against it. What was the timeline from pickup to vote? Did she aruge against, then pickup low PP, then abstain? If so, LoL. Because that's the worst timeline I can think of.
How about the timeline of your smearing posts? Why?
Reply