Originally Posted by
rickair7777
Don't get butthert, I didn't say "cargo was less safe" I said it's different rules, some of which of which equate to risk. Those two events have clear root causes in operating rules which are simply more business-friendly than the equivalent rules for pax.
Plenty of upside to cargo too,and everybody knows the top tier make huge bank and second tier do pretty well too.
Nobody said I was mad. Where did you get that from? I even said you made fair points. Did you miss that part? But considering the context of this thread and the original post, I think you overstepped your expertise with your safety point which you tried to make with your batteries blowing up and planes crashing examples. My point is going there is conveniently ignoring the known equal if not greater risks involved with passenger carriers even at the majors. Listen, we all justify why we are where we are, and in case you are wondering, yes, my assessment of a lower life threatening environment was in my top 3 reasons of why I left a major pax carrier for the cargo world. I’m fortunate to have had the option and understand some never have. Regardless, hopefully we all have good careers and can enjoy beers with each other at the bar. [emoji482]
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk