Originally Posted by
AYLflyer
I want nothing to do with Alaska's scope language. An airline their size with so much of their flying being done by a 3rd party is ridiculous.
We talk about widebodies and expanding into Europe? I'd put my money on Hawaiian. Smaller pilot group, ALPA and they have widebodies.
You have to think that undermining our scope language would be a significant benefit to the company if they pursued an Alaska merger. We would have almost no ability as a group to stop them from bringing regional flying to Jetblue in that case (I welcome corrections if I am wrong). Best case scenario we impose something between our (pretty good) scope and Alaska’s (no scope) scope.