Old 02-08-2022 | 02:17 PM
  #66  
flysnoopy76
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 575
Likes: 28
Default

Originally Posted by paulcg77
I'm not saying they should be, I'm say they'd never go for anything where they aren't at the helm short of a hostile takeover and a shareholder revolt that removes them involuntarily. Look at their history and behavior. Never underestimate self preservation above all else. They will never voluntarily put themselves in a position where they don't have power, and because of this, I stand by what you quoted. In general, I think AS management is extremely conservative, risk averse, and controlling. They do things reactively rather than proactively and out of necessity rather than with a risk vs. reward attitude. And that is why I think they'll do something to stay alive but will take the path of least resistance for something that is easy and less messy/complex.
i

I can’t see Alaska management seeking to buy or merge with anyone at present, if that day comes and they have any say in it I can’t see them touching any carrier which has a fleet of Airbus. Sun Country could happen but I doubt it, I have heard that we tried for Amazon flying and management found the terms of the deal undesirable. Outside of that Sun Country doesn’t provide much upside given as I said before MSP would almost certainly be shut down. Yes you would get some airplanes and pilots, but is that worth the headaches of a merger or acquisition.
If something happens I think it’s more likely a larger carrier comes after Alaska.
Reply