Originally Posted by
Excargodog
You are conveniently avoiding answering the question or dealing with the real issue, which was fleet efficiency. The posting touted narrowbody fleet efficiency, and while I will concede you aren’t in any way responsible for Boeings 737 and 787 problems, that is currently a side issue.
Right now F9 has over 70% NEOs:
htt
Spirit had these numbers as of Sep 2021 and has added NEOs since and will add 24 more this year.
As NK retires 319s and adds 320/321 NEOs their percentage of newer and more fuel efficient aircraft will continue to rise.
The original assertion was that AA had a newer and more fuel efficient NB fleet than anybody else. That statement is demonstrably not true. I NEVER MADE the straw man argument that AA “doesn’t or won’t have a fuel efficient fleet,” merely that their were others with newer and more fuel efficient fleets. AA holds no real advantage over others in this regard.
When did this become a comparison between AA and F9/NK? Go back and read your post #836. In that post you proclaim that AA doesn’t/won’t have a fuel efficient fleet. Even the fleet count numbers you used in that original post were already wrong and outdated. Since then (only Jan 24th) AA ordered 30 more fuel efficient airplanes. Bringing the total 737 MAX and NEOS expected to be on property to 230. And I don’t know about whatever airline you work for, but here we also have another little fuel efficient airplane called the 787. Now you’re suddenly pivoting to comparing our neo vs non-neo percentages to that of NK and F9? What’s that got to do with anything? I’m done with this silly little conversation. You’re just some troll who likes to mix it up, and I’ve clearly allowed myself to fall for it.