Thread: Training
View Single Post
Old 03-26-2022 | 02:40 PM
  #85  
RNO Flyer
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by flysnoopy76
Im glad I’m not the only one who can see reality.
I’d imagine once people start being downgraded and displaced, and the upgrade time goes to more like 8-10 years and reserve is forever, people may leave in higher numbers if the rest of the industry continues to hire while offering good opportunities. That may prevent the possibility of furloughs if we end up 400-500 pilots over staffed.
So I'm an outsider looking in, and I fully understand the A320 divestiture and early A321 divestiture will create displacements over the next two years, but how does that create the stagnation you're talking about over the long term? My understanding is that mainline Alaska currently has 217 aircraft in both fleets with ~3,000 pilots on property. That's 13.8ish pilots per aircraft. From the investor conference presentation (at https://investor.alaskaair.com/stati...a-6d4d96bfdd1c), by the end of 2023 between A320/321 divestiture and 737 acquisition there's 241 aircraft in the fleet. Assuming the crew staffing ratio stays the same, that's 3,332 pilots on property, so 10% pilot group growth in a little over a year and a half plus another 106 new pilots needed to replace mandatory retirements.

From the same presentation, the company has options to expand up to 314 mainline aircraft by 2026. I realize those are options, but the history has been to never not exercise an option. Assuming that holds out with the same crew ratio, that means a 4,341-stong pilot group by the end of 2026. In other words, 44% growth in pilots over a 4-5 year span. IF there's not a change in the dynamics that cause some FOs to bypass upgrade, would it not be reasonable to assume that a similar upgrade/pilot progression timeline for new hires now continues into the next few years?

Like I said, I'm on the outside looking in. What am I missing?
Reply