Originally Posted by
STR8NLVL
Actually dude, the gas per seat/mile of the 170 is pretty darn good, for a jet. You'd have to go back to prop to beat it. The 145 is the gas hog.
Originally Posted by
flyboyzz1
Unless you look at the CRJ700..........
I agree, when comparing the statistics from a friend of mine on the E-170, the CR7 & 9 have better fuel efficiency. Yes, according to him even the CR9 burns less than the E-170 and it carries more Pax.
No flaming so let’s leave it at that.