Originally Posted by
keysersose
So reaching number 10 on the list and the seniority progression that comes with that is not substantially different than reaching number 300 and the progression that comes along with that?
See I would say 3000% is pretty substantial.
So being 10 on the list is 10x better than being #1 on the list? You are making it too complicated. Top 20% of any seniority list will do just fine. Guys crying because they won't retire #1, thinking they would grow organically, laughable.