Here's another solution:

http://www.aviationindustrygroup.com...-1218-1224.pdf

How many of our RJ routes are turboprop replacement routes....quite a few. I know the majority of our routes out of CVG could be replaced by Tprops, for alot less operating costs, instead of the 135's/145s we've got on them. On the less than 500 mile legs, with the price of fuel these days, turboprops are the way to go. As fuel prices increase, the turboprop is more economical on longer stage lengths. I'm seeing a step backward in our future. Also maybe a little re-regulation is in order...the gov't stepping in and forcing airlines to increase prices across the board in order to maintain this country's air travel, which is a critical part of our infrastructure. While the general public would see this as a slight to them in this tough economy, the quality of air travel would increase significantly, as airlines would be more profitable...makes sense.

People have less disposable income these days, and I think instead of driving or looking for alternatives to flying (since there really aren't any that don't cost about the same), people probably just won't travel as much as they had planned since they can't afford it. Biz travellers, those that can afford to pay the extra cost if all the prices go up, will keep on flying, as their business requires it. Discuss