Originally Posted by
Swakid8
Not all 141 schools are not equal. There is a difference between a flight school that just that a flight school that runs 61 and 141 programs in parallel and there’s Part 141 University schools. The folks are maki g about Part 141 university schools just just the structure and curriculum that is required for the R-ATP reduction results in students taking a deeper dive in various course subjects outside of just flying unlike say a Part 141 pilot factory that just has a flying curriculum. So sure, I do believe because of that structured and more in-depth training, yeah there should be a reduction. I say this with both a 61 and 141 background.
‘Sure I’ll give you that the structure environment and tight restrictions at Part 141 universities and handicap students some limiting exposures to a more challenging operating environment and lack of flexibility can lead to slower area development of decision making. But the lack of Hand Flying thing, come on man. That’s showing up from all backgrounds even military…. I tell you what, I enjoyed teaching in a 61 environment with my background as a military vet, Part 61 and 141 uni student. I was able to create a structured training plan for my students and leverage the flexibility of Part 61 to really tailor their training for them.
This is exactly it man. I don’t have a military background, but did exact same with my students. And for the other poster, may I add that not only was I in a “CFI bubble” but have experience flying literally all over this country including Hawaii (IFR and VFR) in all different types of busy airspace. I have low altitude pipeline experience, mountainous terrain, etc. And in all different types of single and multi-engine airplanes. Not trying to build a resume, but proving a point that hand flying and decision making comes from time building experience. Not after a checkride regardless 61 or 141.