Originally Posted by
saturn
Bingo! DL having flexibility is great and all, but certain markets need to be balanced with the specific JV partner. Global scope could just allow reshuffling the fleet around to different markets not tied to a JV partner, meanwhile the JV partner increases their transborder flying to America, capturing all the growth in that market.
Ex:
Say we want to re-add a new route like, or LAX-PPT, or LAX-AUK. At the same time, we see a market to go 2x SYD or even add MEL. Instead of ordering more WBs for the additional route expansion, could we just move our 350s out of Australia entirely and move them to Tahiti and New Zealand, and let Rex get some WBs and fly the 2x or 3x Australia-US?
Can you point to the section of the contract that prevents this scenario right now? Please be specific for my reading comprehension.