This is kind of where I'm at too right now.

I look at this AIP like we're jurors in someone else's trial. We need to go in with an open mind and objective and fair analytics. That said, the assumption must be innocent until proven guilty, which must be beyond the high standard of any doubt that's reasonable.

Right now we're in the grand jury stage, where they can literally TA a ham sandwich. The preponderance of the evidence standard is insufficient for TA MEMRAT. The case presented must be overwhelmingly convincing or its a NO vote acquittal.