Originally Posted by
sqwkvfr
I understand that the nature of training contracts in and of itself will make my position unpopular, but what you've failed to understand here is that this company has a culture that it is trying to preserve. They want happy people who are fun to work with.
I want to work at a company that looks out for it's employees in that manner. I want to work at a place with people who are fun to work with and professional.....not a place full of flying "gods" and arrogant jerks who think that being pretentious is considered "professional."
Grown-up, responsible and confident pilots deal with setbacks like a "quiet professional." I seem to remember that tern being coined on this very web site.
In an industry packed with know-it-all, whining, full-of-themself j@ckasses, I'd like to work for a company that cares enough about it's employees and it's company culture to weed these types out before they hit ground school.
What is described in the original post is one way that one company did just that.
I mean, seriously, if you had an applicant calling and confronting you about an oversight, what would you think? This is normally the stage of the game where you send the interviewer a "thank you" letter even if he told you that you were the worst applicant that they had seen.
Being confrontational before you've even started training is just not a smart thing to do.
Regarding it being his perogative: Of course it's his right.....where did I say that it wasn't? I simply think that it's evidence of the very sort of undesirable personality trait that Lynx HR apparently detected and didn't like.
I am all for a culture of happy workers, and the last time I checked a training contract does not provide that. As I mentioned before, the working rules and contract along with an understood vision for a company does. A training contract does not gaurantee a "happy and fun" pilot as you described, rather one who is either regretting being stuck at an airline with false hopes
or happy to be at an airline with an aspiring future, and not because of a training contract. You mention you want all these qualities, well heck who doesn't!?
A Grown-up, responsible and confident pilots deal with setbacks like a "quiet professional." ? Tell that to ALPA. A set back is being furloughed, a set back is taking a pay freeze, a set back is taking a pay cut, a set back is losing flying to another carrier...etc etc...
A canidate realizing he is required to sign a training contract is not a set back but a lesson learned. Whether he did his homework or not as in this case is irrelevant. I am certain all of us do not have all the details of our current or hopeful employers, noone is perfect. However he did realize it albeit too late. The confrontation term as one mentioned in my opinion may be too strong a term. He inquired on the issue as he should have, and made a personal decision. His fault, possibly; could have been avoided had he reviewed the company, absolutely. Training contract providing everything you mentioned it would in Brady land...not a chance in H**L.