View Single Post
Old 06-11-2022 | 09:53 PM
  #542  
JohnBurke
Disinterested Third Party
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,758
Likes: 74
Default

Originally Posted by 80Z28Dude
I flew 412 to SHV on 21 April and I was surprised to only see 3 MD-11s there. 435, another hard broken airplane and 784, which had just arrived from FRA. Your list shows that I should have seen 5 aircraft according to the dates you show they arrived in SHV. You say there are 5 there now.
The information I posted was current on the day I posted it. I did not post on April 21st. You cannot speak, but to tell a lie. I posted yesterday, June 10. That post cited N411SN, N546JN, N581JN, N784SN. Four airplanes. You state that I identified five in Shreveport. This is a lie on your part. I did not cite N435KD as being in Shreveport, specifically, though YOU identify it as being there.

You have a truth problem. As you brought it up, the status of the four airplanes I cited on June 10th as being in Shreveport, are as follows:
N411SN: Arrived in Shreveport on October 15, 2021, from Anchorage,, and has not departed.
N546JN: Arrived in Shreveport on December 31, 2021, from Los Angeles, and has not departed.
N581JN: Arrived in Shreveport on March 27th, 2022, from MSY. A flight from LAX to SHV was attempted on March 21, but diverted to MSY, and sat there for six days, before positioning to Shreveport, where is has been since.
N784JN: Arrived in Shreveport on April 20th, 2022, from Frankfurt. It has not departed.
All easily verified.

Your lies are not made in ignorance. You know the truth. You refuse to tell it.

Originally Posted by 80Z28Dude
The point was to show, you can take a snapshot of anything and build a story to justify whatever theory you may have. That’s all, This is the second time he’s listed all of our jets and where they are.
Again, you lie.

I listed the position of the aircraft twice preivously; this is the third time. The first time was on February 8th (post 425) in response to a post by wingdeagle11's assertion that aircraft went to RSW for planned maintenance and upgrades, and would be back in service in two days. Satpak77 called out the large presence in RSW. I noted what was there. Simple facts. The second time I cited, was on February 25th (post 452), in defense of WGA. In that case, a poster, who made threats against WGA and who has since been banned, lied about the WGA aircraft status, and I posted their current status and noted that despite the poster's lie, not all WGA aircraft were parked. You'll note, if you read that post, that my citation of WGA aircraft based on their current status at the time, was in defense of WGA.

You are certainly an apologist for the company, and a cheerleader, but one who lies a lot. You should stop.

Last edited by JohnBurke; 06-11-2022 at 10:10 PM.
Reply