Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot

Are you insinuating that better negotiators would have been able to overcome the current financial situation of the company, high fuel prices, war in Europe and a potentially massive recession and got the company to just give us more stuff? And if we are able to get more in the future, how much more and how long and does it make up for what we would give up by voting this down?

I’m just trying to understand the logic behind no and how that helps us. I am as upset as you are because I had higher expectations, but I am also pragmatic and trying to make a financial decision and not an emotional one.