Agreed. Maybe not indict your fellow Pilot before the vote happens? That definitely won’t encourage them to read the agreement and engage in meaningful debate. I read the TA in its entirety twice. I’m not angry about it; I just don’t feel that it’s something we need. There are a lot of small nuggets in it, but none of those nuggets seem to be anything worthy of changing the current CBA for. Still less than 5 hours of pay/credit for work done. A 14% raise, than encompasses 5% already negotiated. $44M that was owed on lCal LTD 10 years ago.

It’s almost like going to the dealership to trade in your car for a better model, then being offered new tires, a radio and a new tumi bag for the trunk. It’s the same car, and now that you’ve invested in it, you’re stuck with it for a few more years. Thanks, but no thanks. I’ll keep what I have until I can truly get an upgraded vehicle.

I’d rather live under this contract until we can get something that keeps up with inflation and keeps us at the top of the heap…..glaringly missing a parity/@me too” clause.

Solid NO for me. But I don’t blame the negotiators. This is the best they could do. Unfortunately, it’s not better, and in some cases worse (10:00am reserve block start) than what we have now.

Solid Pilots don’t make grave decisions that they don’t have to make. I see no reason to change the UPA for a few crumbs that I never asked for…


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk