Originally Posted by rvfanatic

Yes but his excuse was if we tied our rates to inflation since 2012 we would’ve lost. First off, this is a two year contract and we know the inflation estimates so that’s just dumb. Second of all, why did he say 2012? I’m too lazy to check the inflation rates but something tells me there’s political spin and that happens to coincide favorably with his argument. Bring it back to 1970 and I’m sure his argument is shot.