If you support intelligent dissent and welcome an examination of your own ideas, and believe the best ideas will probably win out, you are someone who could loosely be defined as “democratic.”

If you feel compelled to insult people who question your assumptions, create multiple accounts to ensure your opinions echo loudest in the room in an attempt to discourage other points of view, you would fit the definition of a fascist quite well.

I understand there are some strong opinions on section 1, section 3 and PIs staying UAL pilots, but trying to sink this through attempting to discourage others from speaking up if they disagree with you doesn’t make your opinions seem more valid. Again, I get the temptation to “fight the good fight,” but civility is more important than we understand. Let your cogent points speak for themselves