View Single Post
Old 06-29-2022 | 05:47 AM
  #46  
UofM
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Aquaticus
It is a little late to pull back. We trusted him to educate himself on the proposed TA and decide to send it out for MR or not. He didn't look at it objectively or maybe he has lost touch with the line pilot but either one is unforgivable. Time to go fly planes for awhile. Make a mea culpa and resign and maybe run again in a few years once we shoot this turd down.

The townhalls are bordering on offensive. They keep talking like politicians and "we don't believe that to be true". If we were properly staffed, scheduling cared about line pilots QOL, and people were willing to move into positions that put them on reserve their opinions might be true but that isnt how we operate. They said this TA doesn't fix the unfilled captain vacancies or widebody vacancies but "they believe" reserves won't be used for 6 am departures on day one because there will be more reserves than scheduling knows what to do with? The company has been burning through reserves in every base using EVERY reserve EVERY day in some bases for years. 4 or 5 days off a month for commuters just evaporated because two subject matter "experts" don't want to admit a huge foul up. They are living in some fairy tale where the company is going to staff the airline and reserves will be sitting at home. It is a disgusting show of incompetence.
On top of that in the town hall concerning the LCA pay per leg instead of current book for entire trip, they said the company doesn’t have the technology in place to pay only per leg. And as a result would continue to pay the entire trip. That’s how they sold that!! LOL. These guys seriously have no clue and are naive, flat out dumb or know the truth and will do anything to sell this turd. The town halls have been embarrassing.
Reply