Originally Posted by
TheSoCalGuy
Ben-
For the record.....We sit in the same neighborhood of seniority, especially from the Pre-Merge Pedigree......That said, A LOT of the said concerns above have germane merit on this thread.
The voice's speak, and so does the decent of the current TA. To try and discourage/stifle any disaccord is as much of general dereliction as those who crafted/voted "YES" on this "turd".
You once sat in such an LEC IAH. If you can articulate the "YES" mentality as your LEC did, would LOVE to hear it. PLEASE do NOT attempt to quell any/all opinions of those who have the rightful to oppose this extremely subpar TA.......Anything otherwise in disingenuous on your part as a former leader in your current LEC, let alone example going forward during this pivotal time........Regards......Another Line Pilot..
Lotsa ground covered there. I’m in absolute disagreement with those whom voted yes at the MEC level. Haven’t spoken with either yet, so I haven’t grabbed my torches and pitchforks yet.
IMHO, the only way to make this right is a vast leadership change in order fix the obvious disconnect which has occurred. Sometimes, negotiators can get too close to the table, if you know what I mean, but I just haven’t seen anything from the LEC Reps or NC that leads me to believe and willful harm was intended. In any case, intent is currently irrelevant.
I understand the frustration, but just deem it more effective to replace and repair without negotiating in public. I also don’t feel the need for revenge; reprimand yes.
Also, most Pilots are middle of the road and reasonable folks. I’m not for this TA, but optics matter. The more b@tsh!T crazy we look, the better the sales job appears.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk