This is confusing …

“MEC unanimously decided the ballot will remain open”

So the reps who initially did not believe that it was in the best interest of the pilot group to submit the TA for membership ratification have changed their mind…?

Or, is there some reading between the lines and they are asking for a significant level of rejection..?
That seems like one hell of a calculated risk.

At a minimum it would be great to hear from the reps that produced the con letter to hear what they specifically intended by their participation in today’s unanimous vote.