Originally Posted by
ShyGuy
You've already written you basically couldn't care less about their meal or rest breaks as long as they get their 1 hr additional pay per day. So that proves this isn't about safety or what's best for their health, we're just buying them off based on how the existing law is written. I'm sure the company and other airlines will figure out something for California based crews, time will tell.
Oh ShyGuy, we had left it amicably, but that wasn't good enough for you.
You know what I care about? The company threatening the
nuclear option whenever they lose. The AFA scored a win in the California courts, and the company threw a tantrum like children. They threatened to take their ball and go home. They were petulant and abusive.
Of course, the flight attendants need breaks. If their CBA doesn't have language for meal breaks (90 years) then I'm happy that
any government agency is stepping in for them.
So don't you dare to presume to know what I care about. I support labor. You only support yourself.