Originally Posted by Jdub2

I see where your brain is shorting now, maybe I can translate to something easier for you to understand!

Example:
Bertrand declares that a teapot is, at this very moment, in orbit around the Sun between the Earth and Mars, and that because no one can prove him wrong, his claim is therefore a valid one.

Reality:
Sonic Flyer declares that the 1500 hour rule has no effect on safety, and that because no one can prove him wrong, his claim is therefore a valid one.

You are the one arguing. We aren't proposing to make the 1500 hour rule. It is already made. There is no argument.
You are arguing we should amend the qualifications, therefore you need to prove your argument.

I'm not sure I can make this any more simple, but in the likely event you still don't comprehend I will see if I can make it even more simple for you