Originally Posted by
TipTanks
I hope someone is making the DB Cooper meme on Facebook as we speak.
Serious question. If there was a TA that was reviewed and “voted” on by the whole SAPA crew, but now it’s taken 3 weeks and counting for that to be made into something that the pilot group can see….did the SAPA group actually vote on anything?
To say it another way, how could something be vote-ready for SAPA but need a month of revisions before it can go in front of normal pilots?
I know the condescending SAPA leadership thinks we’re knuckle dragging idiots with “no understanding of how the process works” but they seem to be getting led off the cliff just like the rest of us.
Jokes aside, I think that SAPA and the company are actually reviewing and debating contractual language before bringing it to the pilot group. Example of verbiage that could be well-intentioned, but not meet legal scrutiny... In the list of priority for reserves, it does not state that CS has to "attempt" to use reserves in xyz order, just that they must "consider" reserves in xyz order. Thus, they may "consider" it in their noggin, and then assign it to whoever.
Is having confidence in SAPA foolish? Probably. But I'd like to believe that they're ironing out legal language and minute details before allowing us to vote on it.