Originally Posted by
Aquaticus
No 756 EWR CA or 320 EWR CA after 45 unfilled 320 CA last bid. I am wondering if this has to do with the 787 vs 350 decision. If 787 can be had at a discount to replace 767 flying at a better fuel burn / mx cost. I never expected to see a 350 but beefy 787 staffing leaves me to believe they decided.
The A350 is more on par with the 777 range and payload than the 787. It's more like a 777X vs A350 decision. Look at Delta...
Any staffing decisions due to anything A350 related remains years away.
The beefy 787 staffing is surely due to the long-awaited resumption of deliveries.