View Single Post
Old 09-06-2022 | 11:31 AM
  #396  
bugman61
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 13
Default

Originally Posted by TED74
Instant tax savings of 40% without me lifting a finger sounds pretty good to me, even if the returns on that money are only 5% with extraordinarily low risk. Perhaps no where else in my portfolio will I need to hold bonds and my overall risk matrix post-MBCBP looks just like it did before MBCBP. But I will have added 10-50k more tax deferral than I had before the program was established.

DALPA was tasked with improving retirement and this seems like a win to me. It’s stated to have optional participation. If it turns out not to be optional, it won’t be implemented. If these things are good enough for high-earner private practice docs/lawyers/entrepreneurs, they’re good enough for me. Y’all want to pay the tax man first and then go crawl that money back through side gigs, property management, tenant evictions, complicated audit-attracting tax returns and hvac repair calls at 3am, it sounds like those options will all be available instead of using the MBCBP.
It’s not a savings of 40%. It’s a deferral of 40% that could be more or less when you take withdrawals.


Also the calculus is entirely different for the general target of MBCBP participants which is individuals and partnerships with shorter time frames and likely higher targeted rates of return.
Reply