Originally Posted by
TED74
They also only apply certain mitigations to bid pack rotations but not to broken trips, reroutes or reserve assignments. Everyone knows rerouted pilots don’t need the same safety mitigations that other pilots need, amiright???
Safety first-ish! (bid pack)… but then more like third or fourth once flying is actually being executed. If they shared the mitigations they’ve agreed are fatiguing with the masses, they’d have to be accountable. If they keep them secret, we’ll only learn about them in the hull loss after action report.
Secrets always get out eventually. The previous committee chair has retired and knows what is being done. The NDA would be difficult to enforce if at all. I'm guessing that if liability is ever an issue there will be an investigation. The fact that the company is trying to keep fatigue mitigation a secret and didn't apply it in all circumstances would make them look worse and show intent. PB is supposed to be the only one who can decide to suspend the "secret 28" but apparently they don't ask him and do it anyway. That puts risk on him and the planners but he is the responsible party.