Originally Posted by
Bluedriver
That 2% was never MY estimate. Still, for you to keep ALL of your relative seniority, it has to come from others, and it does so from what would have been MY future seniority progression when hundreds, maybe closer to 1k of younger NK pilots hired well after me (and much younger on average) get placed in front of me and pillage my future seniority movement, and the future movement of hundreds of others like me.
100% DOH would work better for me, yet I have not advocated for that, and haven't been a whiny baby that I won't get it. Because I understand that wouldn't be "fair". Others here don't care about "fair" or others, and just want all five sandwiches for themselves, and everyone else can starve.
And where did I say it was your estimate? I just refuted his numbers. I haven't advocated for 100% RS. I have stated that 50% would be an immediate decrease in the RS seniority of the 10 year in group at NK. Irrefutable.
Show me the numbers of how it would impact your life if those " hundreds, maybe closer to 1k of younger NK pilots hired well after me (and much younger on average) get placed in front of" you would impact your future seniority. If we go by 100% RS just as many relatively speaking would be added behind you, so zero impact on your seniority initially.
Yes if they are younger they will impact your upward progression. But you have no clue by how much because we don't have DOB on our seniority list. Anecdotes =/= data.
And FYI, that second sentence of you definitely blocks out the engine noise: If we go by 50% what will happen to "MY seniority progression when hundreds, maybe closer to 1k of JB pilots hired well below me in RS get placed in front of me and pillage my seniority movement, and the movement of hundreds of others like me". (see what I did there?)