Old 10-13-2022 | 04:58 AM
  #10  
jerryleber
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 1,592
Likes: 153
From: 787 FO
Default

Originally Posted by AxlF16
...you obviously don't get sarcasm.
Actually, it is you who doesn't get it. Too funny.

Originally Posted by AxlF16
The only fact that matters is the vote count right?
Wrong.

This resolution had the support of the following councils: C5-EWR, C11-DCA, C12-ORD and C173-GUM but failed on a roll call vote 5316 FOR and 5338 AGAINST with one abstention by the IAH FO rep who obviously has no business being a rep.
Reply