I guess I’m just trying to figure out the issue you have with our current rep when compared with the other candidate.

I mean, even the platform she’s running on is ridiculous: “I agree with everything our current rep believes, and would have voted the same way he did—even on LOA 20-03 and 20-04—given the feedback received from constituents. I just happened to have been a UNA and didn’t like it.”

Seriously… that’s the platform: Disdain for voting against an LOA that she, herself, said she would have voted the same way for if in his shoes given the feedback received from his constituents.

Let me repeat this: She wants to tout that she doesn’t like his vote, yet would have voted the same way? Seriously—does that make sense?

The other candidate (MJ) has no experience on our MEC and no understanding of our current contract negotiations, as she hasn’t been a part of any DALPA committee in her short career at DAL.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk