Originally Posted by
NavyFlyer
I guess I’m just trying to figure out the issue you have with our current rep when compared with the other candidate.
I mean, even the platform she’s running on is ridiculous: “I agree with everything our current rep believes, and would have voted the same way he did—even on LOA 20-03 and 20-04—given the feedback received from constituents. I just happened to have been a UNA and didn’t like it.”
Seriously… that’s the platform: Disdain for voting against an LOA that she, herself, said she would have voted the same way for if in his shoes given the feedback received from his constituents.
Let me repeat this: She wants to tout that she doesn’t like his vote, yet would have voted the same way? Seriously—does that make sense?
The other candidate (MJ) has no experience on our MEC and no understanding of our current contract negotiations, as she hasn’t been a part of any DALPA committee in her short career at DAL.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The issue is not this one particularly poor decision to vote no to an obvious yes.
It’s that he won’t be able to make the right call when faced with a similar situation. I’m sure WB is a very nice guy. He has shown himself to be too easily influenced.
It’s always the safe play to say you deserved more. LOA 20-04 was one of the rare, obvious yes votes and he couldn’t even get there.
How long will he hold up your new PWA because he’s scared to explain his yes?