Originally Posted by
cornbeef007
He wasn’t correct in 2015, so 100% is a strong order. I’m not trying to attack but if we would have accepted TA1, it would have been a cataclysmic fail not only for us but the entire industry.
As you said times have changed, so the philosophy of “constructive collaboration” with the company is no longer relevant. It works when the company is in trouble(2004) but not when they are minting cash(2015).
One can argue the time value of money but 95% of us know better than that, thankfully.
I agree with all. My comment meant to start at TA1.