Originally Posted by
StartngOvr
You continue to ignore the fact that it negatively impacts others. You are convinced its just "doesn't benefit" them. Repeatedly saying seniority being honored "is ridiculous" doesn't make it so.
I don’t care about someone wanting to go on vacation being a higher priority than someone going to/from work.
Commuting is a choice, as is living in base. Your sense of entitlement based on your choice "is ridiculous."
I have no sense of entitlement about PSC whatsoever. I’m talking about a hypothetical situation in which PSC were negotiated into the PWA. Utilizing a provision of the PWA isn’t ‘entitlement.’
You have yet to rationally explain why you think that you are entitled to an empty cabin seat that a fellow employee could non-rev on rather than flowing up to a jumpseat, thus allowing a non-rev employee the cabin seat.
I’ve never said I’m entitled to a seat, just like nonrevvers are not entitled to a seat. If PSC is a provision in the PWA, then booking a seat would simply be exercising a provision of the PWA, same as the nonrevver.
I always book the JS instead of listing as a nonrev, so more nonrevs can make it on. Also, in your hypothetical scenario (which is false), that employee could list for the JS since it would be open.
When PSC was a thing, it was incredibly easy to book the JS; almost all of them were open. That’s almost a guaranteed seat, it’s far better than rolling the dice with nonrev.