View Single Post
Old 11-21-2022 | 03:35 PM
  #32  
Lewbronski
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MudhammedCJ
That's why IMO we absolutely SHOULD get preference when merging with a far less financially secure company. ALPA merger policy is a equity scheme. Wait and see if any of the legacies try to fold their wholely owned regionals into their list. That stupid policy will evaporate like a fart in the wind.
”Fair and equitable” seniority list integrations are required by federal law (McCaskill-Bond) and are not simply a requirement of ALPA carriers merging under ALPA’s merger policy.

Read it for yourself:

​​​​​​The legislation, known as the McCaskill-Bond statute, was signed into law in December 2007 and is codified at 49 U.S.C. § 42112.[/size]The statute applies when two or more air carriers are involved in a "covered transaction," described as:
  1. A transaction for the combination of multiple air carriers into a single air carrier; and which
  2. Involves the transfer of ownership or control of—
  3.  
    1. 50 percent or more of the equity securities (as defined in section 101 of title 11, United States Code) of an air carrier; or
    2. 50 percent or more (by value) of the assets of the air carrier. 49 U.S.C. § 42112 (b)(4).
When such a covered transaction "results in the combination of crafts or classes that are subject to the Railway Labor Act," "sections 3 and 13 of the labor protective provisions imposed by the Civil Aeronautics Board ("CAB" or the "Board") in the Allegheny-Mohawk merger (as published at 59 C.A.B. 45) shall apply to the integration of covered employees of the covered air carriers." Id. § 42112(a). In short, these Allegheny-Mohawk Labor Protective Provisions ("LPPs") require that the carrier make provisions "for the integration of seniority lists in a fair and equitable manner," including negotiation with union representatives and binding arbitration in covered transactions. The participants in this negotiation/arbitration process are the affected employee groups, and the carrier or carriers involved.
Reply