Originally Posted by
Gundam
Someone else said they didn't want the vote put out, and it's odd that the Treasurer brought it up and made the strike vote a point of differentiation. I just found that an interesting point they chose to make and it adds to what others have stated. Maybe they mean some were reluctant but followed along?
From what I've heard, he was pushing back because he wanted to wait until after the next negotiating session because, based on reluctant participation in the Lanyard and Hat campaign, he was worried he'd blow our one shot. He still voted for it.
And what's most sad is that conversation was leaked from closed session by one of the other councils. We need people in the room who aren't afraid to share their opinion without fear that it might be leaked and used against them. I don't want group think in the MEC.