Originally Posted by
Teamroper
You’re right.
If I had been on the line for awhile I would be able to see how well your current strategy is working for you, and how happy you are with your results.
I can’t imagine how these substantive arguments are tuned-out by the majority of your voting base.
My operating assumption is that “Teamroper” is in the employ of the company or one of the company’s consultants, is in thrall of the company, is a rando that simply is opposed to the idea of organized labor, or some combination of the four possibilities.
However, that doesn’t mean that I don’t want to try to hear our opposition’s arguments in order to be able to develop the best ideas to defeat them. I also want to hear their attacks upon our positions in order to better understand their tactics and the arguments or approaches they believe are the best ways to undermine what we’re trying to accomplish. In that respect, I think likely company operatives like “Teamroper” can be valuable.