View Single Post
Old 12-12-2022 | 08:43 AM
  #104  
Mkupetz
On Reserve
 
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
From where?



787 was never designed to replace the 767. It was Boeings counter to the A380. Airbus thought the future was high density hub to hub, Boeing (correctly) forecasted a shift to long thin routes.

The 789 is the only variant that can do SFO-SIN, and it’s in no way a 772 replacement. The -10 is close.

Boeing has said unequivocally there will be nothing even resembling a new airplane the rest of this decade. They’re still trying to turn a profit on the 787 program and they’ll probably never dig themselves out of the losses the Max created. The last thing they have the ability to do is outlay a few dozen billion for another new airplane, more so one that their bean counters will screw up again.

They're making a 787-10 IGW version, Air New Zealand has been pushing for years. Makes the range ~same 777-200 with 42 more seats. Way better option long term.

https://leehamnews.com/2022/01/05/hotr-boeing-works-on-hgw-787-10-and-the-787-9/
Reply